Here's the summary of what we've put forward thus far.[...]
Security / Privacy ==================
Binkp secure encryption for all hubs.
Better privacy.
SSH officially supported.
SSH for specific echos.
Security / Privacy ==================
Binkp secure encryption for all hubs.
Better privacy.
SSH officially supported.
SSH for specific echos.
There would probably need to be more discussion around this. I'm all for adding privacy/encryption to things, but it's only as strong as its weakest link. I'm not sure echomail was ever designed with privacy in mind.
BBSs were pretty secure back in the day. There was no http, ftp,
gopher or any internet involved. There was simply a BBS login.. :)
We can provide echo areas and netmail, but not privacy. Not today.
*** Quoting Avon from a message to All ***
Security / Privacy ==================
Binkp secure encryption for all hubs.
Better privacy.
SSH officially supported.
SSH for specific echos.
There would probably need to be more discussion around this. I'm all for adding privacy/encryption to things, but it's only as
strong as its weakest link. I'm not sure echomail was ever designed with privacy in mind.
Sure there could be a policy put in place that FSX_SECURE is only to be made available over SSH connections, e.g: s20OS on Mystic,
which would mean my Telegard system couldn't carry it it all, but then how can you enforce that it's only distributed over secure
bink connections?
Al wrote to Avon <=-
Re: Re: fsxNet Feedback
By: Avon to All on Sun May 09 2021 01:51 pm
Is there a need for separate BBS echos? Could they be merged
to one? (+1 agree).
-1
I don't think individual areas for different software is a bad thing
and folks can connect or not as they choose.
Avon wrote to All <=-
Just a quick request to solicit for any feedback you may wish to
share about fsxNet.
If you have any thoughts on how things are going at present,
stuff you would like to see more/less of, ideas for echos/file
areas etc to add/remove etc. Stuff that could be done differently
or things reinstated etc.
You get the idea. Any feedback good, bad or otherwise appreciated.
If you have any thoughts on how things are going at present, stuff you would like to see more/less of, ideas for echos/file areas etc to add/remove etc. Stuff that could be done differently or things reinstated etc.
Avon wrote to All <=-
If you have any thoughts on how things are going at present, stuff you would like to see more/less of, ideas for echos/file areas etc to add/remove etc. Stuff that could be done differently or things
reinstated etc.
You get the idea. Any feedback good, bad or otherwise appreciated.
If you have any thoughts on how things are going at present, stuff you would like to see more/less of, ideas for echos/file areas etc to add/remove etc. Stuff that could be done differently or things
reinstated etc.
FSX.HAMBURGERS - and beyond
2) Better message threading (in FSX_GENERAL).
No idea how to achieve this.
2) Better message threading (in FSX_GENERAL).
No idea how to achieve this.
This is the job of the message editor used by the users.
But yes, this is a problem that cuts some threads into smaller sub-threads with no connection between the messages.
Just a quick request to solicit for any feedback you may wish to share
about fsxNet.
If you have any thoughts on how things are going at present, stuff you
would like to see more/less of, ideas for echos/file areas etc to
add/remove etc. Stuff that could be done differently or things reinstated etc.
This is the job of the message editor used by the users.
That's the problem, there is no easy way to fix it. Or is there?
For me this is the biggest usability problem in fsxNet. It works fine in othernets (like Fidonet), so it's not an FTN problem in general.
Just a quick request to solicit for any feedback you may wish to share about fsxNet.
We could use more areas, just what areas I am not sure. I wouldn't want
to see a long list of areas that are not used but a healthy list of
areas where people can talk about... things. :)
I have been thinking of starting a new FDN for gaming related files. I am something of a gamer. I like games like Doom, Quake, Unreal, Duke3D and others.
If that fits fsxNet and the users are interested in that we could do
that.
The only thing I'm thinking about:
- Consolidate the several BBS software support echos into FSX_BBS
- maybe create a RetroComputing echo? :)
Why? What is the disadvantage of low-traffic echos? It's not that
echomail areas are a limited resource.
At least keep FSX_MYS seperate or 90% of the messages in FSX_BBS would
be about Mystic.
I have been thinking of starting a new FDN for gaming related files. I
am something of a gamer. I like games like Doom, Quake, Unreal, Duke3D
and others.
The only thing I'm thinking about:
- Consolidate the several BBS software support echos into FSX_BBS
Why? What is the disadvantage of low-traffic echos? It's not that echomail areas are a limited resource.
At least keep FSX_MYS seperate or 90% of the messages in FSX_BBS would be about Mystic.
a game echo and some file bases appeals.. I was think also for other
echos perhaps something that covers Marvel/DC comics/movies etc... and something about Space stuff so SpaceX,Nasa etc... anyway I'll be quiet again.
It also allows others to filter out what might otherwise be noise to
them, I'm sure there are plenty of mystic users who couldn't care less about talisman posts, and vice versa. It's not a bad thing, just not everyone wants to spend their time on everything.
i have noticed that fsxNet seems to be largely technical and lacking of a 'entertainment' sort of echo. the general echo seems to be a stand in for just about everything.
that said i haven't noticed a time where i was like "all of these movie messages.. i wish they were going somewhere else so i didn't have to sift through them"
i have noticed that fsxNet seems to be largely technical and lacking
of a 'entertainment' sort of echo. the general echo seems to be a
stand in for just about everything.
that said i haven't noticed a time where i was like "all of these
movie messages.. i wish they were going somewhere else so i didn't
have to sift through them"
Black Panther wrote to Avon <=-
more hours in the day
1) Long names for the echomail areas:
Al wrote to Avon <=-
We could use more areas, just what areas I am not sure. I wouldn't want
to see a long list of areas that are not used but a healthy list of
areas where people can talk about... things. :)
I have been thinking of starting a new FDN for gaming related files. I am something of a gamer. I like games like Doom, Quake, Unreal, Duke3D and others.
Isnt that gamenet?
@BBSID: TRMB
Re: fsxNet Feedback
By: deon to Al on Thu May 06 2021 02:21 pm
Isnt that gamenet?
I don't actually know what is going on in gamenet these days. I still
get applications for gamenet from time to time but I have no access to
the server anymore so I ask those applicants to send their app to
Marissa.
I still poll the gamenet hub for netmail if that ever happens but I
haven't got a netmail for a long time and I'm not sure how that is all setup now.
But no, what I was speaking of is something we may do here, we'll have
to see how all this feed back and stuff shakes out.
Ttyl :-),
Al
i tried to apply at Marissa, but no response :(
Here's the summary of what we've put forward thus far. I've tried to
If there's anything missing from this brain dump of feedback etc. also
let me know.
After a few more days to ensure this is correct my next steps will be to respond to it all and try to put some order around what we can work on addressing first, second etc.
Final call for anything else you want to add. I plan to circle back to this thread in the coming day or so.
A file area for themes perhaps.
It's out of my own skill set but that could be useful.
Do you mean BBS themes, menus and ANSIs etc.?
Yes, mystic has a new themes setup that folks can use to build their own themes.
Synchronet also can do that although it works in it's own way.
I was thinking of a file area where these sort of files could be shared when authors want to do that.
Final call for anything else you want to add. I plan to circle back to this thread in the coming day or so.
messages waiting in FSX_GEN. It'd be nice to split them up into other echoes, but I don't have an idea as to how to do that, either.
There are worse problems for a network to have.
Many thanks to everyone who took the time to reply to this thread. If you have not yet, do feel free to do so.
It's Sat morning here and I have a full day coming up. What I am
planning to do next is to try and spend some time tonight to write up
all the feedback and then post a summary of it here to ensure I have captured the main themes etc. correctly.
Is there a need for separate BBS echos? Could they be merged
to one? (+1 agree).
Thanks again for this feedback. It's very helpful.
Sysop: | Gary Ailes |
---|---|
Location: | Pittsburgh, PA |
Users: | 132 |
Nodes: | 5 (0 / 5) |
Uptime: | 109:42:42 |
Calls: | 733 |
Files: | 2,171 |
Messages: | 81,483 |