For you Linux users... what's your pick - screen or tmux, and why?
Thanks.
... All hope abandon, ye who enter messages here.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
anthk wrote to Gamgee <=-
@MSGID: <614B942D.11157.dove-lnx@vert.synchro.net>
@REPLY: <608B54B9.392.dove-unix@palantirbbs.ddns.net>
On 2021-04-30, Gamgee <gamgee@PALANT> wrote:
For you Linux users... what's your pick - screen or tmux, and why?
Thanks.
... All hope abandon, ye who enter messages here.
--- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
Tmux user here, because of OpenBSD base and well, I set
a clonic OpenBSD base under Void Linux, with very close
config and constraints. As a plug, I have framebuffer
support for SDL(2), mplayer, mpv, fbi, fbpdf2 and fbdjvu.
For comic books, I use fbi+a script to uncompress the files,
and for IM, bitlbee+kirc work well, among links,s-nail and
getmail.
I've been weeks without X, and I won't miss it. Groff+Mom
typesets math perfectly, gnuplot is dumb easy and sc-im
and catdoc and/or antiword will do the same on docx/rtf/
xls files.
Current games require 16GB of RAM, a 20x more powerful GPU
and a 10x better CPU, so that's a no-no for me.
Slashem, interactive fiction and mednafen could keep me busy
for years.
---
screen are fresh in my head, I don't remember them for screen. I have a menu set to SSH into particular servers, and those shortcuts set up a terminal with screen. Screen has ZMODEM support which I do use.
MRO wrote to Boraxman <=-
@MSGID: <614C9155.779.dove-nix@bbses.info>
@REPLY: <614C312F.2856.dove-nix@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
Re: Re: Screen or tmux?
By: Boraxman to anthk on Thu Sep 23 2021 05:47 pm
screen are fresh in my head, I don't remember them for screen. I have a menu set to SSH into particular servers, and those shortcuts set up a terminal with screen. Screen has ZMODEM support which I do use.
whether you want to send or receive, and screen will then bring up a prompt with sz or rz, allowing you to run then on the local end. When you accept that command, the transfer proceeds.
Its convienient when you ssh to a remote server, and just want to send an adhoc file back or forth.
MRO wrote to Boraxman <=-
@MSGID: <614DDFD8.781.dove-nix@bbses.info>
@REPLY: <614D645B.2858.dove-nix@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
Re: Re: Screen or tmux?
By: Boraxman to MRO on Fri Sep 24 2021 03:31 pm
whether you want to send or receive, and screen will then bring up a prompt with sz or rz, allowing you to run then on the local end. When you accept that command, the transfer proceeds.
Its convienient when you ssh to a remote server, and just want to send an adhoc file back or forth.
oh, i made a script that i use with winscp.com for sending files to my server. ---
Boraxman wrote to MRO <=-
whether you want to send or receive, and screen will then bring up a prompt with sz or rz, allowing you to run then on the local end. When you accept that command, the transfer proceeds.
Its convienient when you ssh to a remote server, and just want to send an adhoc file back or forth.
oh, i made a script that i use with winscp.com for sending files to my server.
I use Linux, so SCP is an option, but it means starting another
shell to run the command. Zmodem means I can do it within the
shell.
whether you want to send or receive, and screen will then bring up a
prompt with sz or rz, allowing you to run then on the local end.
When you accept that command, the transfer proceeds.
Its convienient when you ssh to a remote server, and just want to
send an adhoc file back or forth.
oh, i made a script that i use with winscp.com for sending files to
my server.
I use Linux, so SCP is an option, but it means starting another
shell to run the command. Zmodem means I can do it within the
shell.
Did not know about this ability within screen. Very cool. Just tried
it and it works perfectly.
DaiTengu wrote to Gamgee <=-
I use Linux, so SCP is an option, but it means starting another
shell to run the command. Zmodem means I can do it within the
shell.
Did not know about this ability within screen. Very cool. Just tried
it and it works perfectly.
I use MobaXTerm in windows which has a small built-in scp gui
where you can click/drag files to transfer them. It's not free,
but it's well worth it, especially when you have to deal with and
organize over a thousand different servers.
DaiTengu wrote to Gamgee <=-
I use MobaXTerm in windows which has a small built-in scp gui where
you can click/drag files to transfer them. It's not free, but it's
well worth it, especially when you have to deal with and organize over
a thousand different servers.
poindexter FORTRAN wrote to DaiTengu <=-
It's not free
I'll have to take another look at MobaXTerm. We're using a combination
of Putty, WinSCP and an autologin plugin for Keepass that's nice.
I use Linux, so SCP is an option, but it means starting another
shell to run the command. Zmodem means I can do it within the
shell.
Did not know about this ability within screen. Very cool. Just
tried it and it works perfectly.
I use MobaXTerm in windows which has a small built-in scp gui
where you can click/drag files to transfer them. It's not free,
but it's well worth it, especially when you have to deal with and
organize over a thousand different servers.
Thankfully, Windows is not something I have to deal with.
I wish there was an easy way to package Putty destinations and share them, we have 10 developers and it'd be nice to package all of the usual hosts when I image systems for them.
DaiTengu wrote to poindexter FORTRAN <=-
It should be pretty easy to create a web page with links to all the servers people need to access. a browser can auto-launch PuTTY. They'd just need to make sure their key was loaded.
Quoting poindexter FORTRAN to DaiTengu <=-
I wish there was an easy way to package Putty destinations and share
them, we have 10 developers and it'd be nice to package all of the
usual hosts when I image systems for them.
Sysop: | Gary Ailes |
---|---|
Location: | Pittsburgh, PA |
Users: | 132 |
Nodes: | 5 (0 / 5) |
Uptime: | 108:52:48 |
Calls: | 733 |
Files: | 2,171 |
Messages: | 81,483 |