Will Trumpsters accept that there was no fraud now? Or did the leftists conspirators "get" to the highest court in our land?No fraud.. Wrong..
1. Thousands of dead voters (confirmed)
2. Video footage of observers cleared out of room followed by the remaining workers pulling suitcases from under a table (confirmed)
3. 1.8 million ballots sen out in PA..2.5 million returned (confirmed).
4. 430,000+ ballots to Biden in MI in 2.5 hours. Physically impossible as machines can process apx 96,000 in this timeframe.(confirmed)
member Rudy's STAR DRUNK BIMBO witness? Laughable!
1. Thousands of dead voters (confirmed)
2. Video footage of observers cleared out of room followed by the
remaining workers pulling suitcases from under a table (confirmed)
3. 1.8 million ballots sen out in PA..2.5 million returned
(confirmed). 4. 430,000+ ballots to Biden in MI in 2.5 hours.
Physically impossible as machines can process apx 96,000 in this
timeframe.(confirmed)
These are certainly allegations of fraud... You say "confirmed". To whose standards? Clearly yours... but to every judge who heard the evidence? Nope.
Court, does't it? Do you REALLY wanna make that big of a conspiracy case out of this? Or accept the reality that Donald Trump really did lose the election.
These are certainly allegations of fraud... You say "confirmed". To whose standards? Clearly yours... but to every judge who heard the evidence? Nope.
the judges are doing what they want. if they wont hear obvious evidence, they are not following their oaths.
the judges are doing what they want. if they wont hear obvious
evidence, they are not following their oaths.
So... to me the two most likely explanations for why the Supreme Court won't overturn the election are:
MRO wrote to Hobo <=-
Re: Supreme Court Rejects Texas Lawsuit
By: Hobo to MRO on Sun Dec 13 2020 04:41 am
the judges are doing what they want. if they wont hear obvious
evidence, they are not following their oaths.
So... to me the two most likely explanations for why the Supreme Court won't overturn the election are:
shut the fuck up. you are not on facebook, motherfucker.
go fuck off.
you asked and people told you. there are fucking videos of it. there
are affidavits.
i'm so sick of fucking trump haters. i hear trumpster and it makes me
want to smash a brick in their head. i'm so sick of pieces of shit like you.
go fix you life instead of hating on conservatives.
go fix you life instead of hating on conservatives.
go fix you life instead of hating on conservatives.
Anytime I see "Trumpster, Trumpbot, etc", I know what type of person is writing. For the most part, I just pass them by.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects Texas Lawsuit
By: Hobo to MRO on Sun Dec 13 2020 04:41 am
shut the fuck up. you are not on facebook, motherfucker.
go fuck off.
you asked and people told you. there are fucking videos of it. there are affidavits.
i'm so sick of fucking trump haters. i hear trumpster and it makes me want to smash a brick in their head. i'm so sick of pieces of shit like you.
go fix you life instead of hating on conservatives.
Re: Supreme Court Rejects Texas Lawsuit
Re: Supreme Court Rejects Texas Lawsuit
By: Hobo to MRO on Sun Dec 13 2020 04:41 am
shut the fuck up. you are not on facebook, motherfucker.
go fuck off.
you asked and people told you. there are fucking videos of it. there are affidavits.
i'm so sick of fucking trump haters. i hear trumpster and it makes me want to smash a brick in their head. i'm so sick of pieces of shit like you.
go fix you life instead of hating on conservatives.
Gotta agree on that last point, but Jesus Christ dude. You hungry? Sometimes I hangry post, but that was a real Gamer moment.
þ Crystal Palace, Orbitsville þ
Re: Supreme Court Rejects Texas Lawsuit
By: Vlk-451 to MRO on Mon Dec 28 2020 02:00:23
Re: Supreme Court Rejects Texas Lawsuit
Re: Supreme Court Rejects Texas Lawsuit
By: Hobo to MRO on Sun Dec 13 2020 04:41 am
shut the fuck up. you are not on facebook, motherfucker.
go fuck off.
you asked and people told you. there are fucking videos of it. there are affidavits.
i'm so sick of fucking trump haters. i hear trumpster and it makes me want to smash a brick in their head. i'm so sick of pieces of shit like you.
go fix you life instead of hating on conservatives.
Gotta agree on that last point, but Jesus Christ dude. You hungry? Sometimes I hangry post, but that was a real Gamer moment.
Crystal Palace, Orbitsville
Trump is just the big bully at the playground, he always has been. He lost, like three times now. Fkn cry baby. He's the one that needs to go fk off, and if you are stupid enough to follow that idiot, you can too. ;)
Trump is just the big bully at the playground, he always has been. He lost, lik
three times now. Fkn cry baby. He's the one that needs to go fk off, and if you
are stupid enough to follow that idiot, you can too. ;)
Trump is just the big bully at the playground, he always has been. He lost, like three times now. Fkn cry baby. He's the one that needs to go fk off, and if you are stupid enough to follow that idiot, you can too. ;)
In 2016, Trump was a bully. So was his opponent, HRC. There wasn't a good
anybody that doesnt like trump is probably living off assistance or they are
When it comes down to it though people... Going against your country's health organisation and killing thousands, refusing to accept loss in a system created by the people so tyranny couldn't reign.. All of these anti-unity actions... such a shame.
Re: trump
By: MRO to Philthy74 on Mon Dec 28 2020 20:00:00
anybody that doesnt like trump is probably living off assistance or
they are
and believe in a round Earth, yes.
you have no proof the world is round.
Re: trump
By: Vlk-451 to Philthy74 on Mon Dec 28 2020 08:10:48
Thanks Mom
Re: trump
By: MRO to Philthy74 on Mon Dec 28 2020 20:00:00
anybody that doesnt like trump is probably living off assistance or they are
and believe in a round Earth, yes.
Re: trump
By: MRO to Philthy74 on Wed Dec 30 2020 02:00 am
you have no proof the world is round.
https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Good-Fellas-Hilarious.jpg
you have no proof the world is round.
https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Good-Fellas-Hilarious.jpg
all we have are artist renderings of the earth. dont you think that's weird
you have no proof the world is round.
https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Good-Fellas-Hilarious.jpg
all we have are artist renderings of the earth. dont you think that's weird. ---
he didnt kill thousands or any of that other shit. he was taking action when people were calling hin a zenophobe.
you have no proof the world is round.
I'll have you know, I think Trump isn't literally Hitler AND I live with the immense help of assistance.
Re: trump
By: MRO to Nightfox on Wed Dec 30 2020 11:42 pm
you have no proof the world is round.
https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Good-Fellas-Hilarious.jpg
all we have are artist renderings of the earth. dont you think that's
weird
The lunar landings were fake so of course any pictures of earth are also fake. ;-)
https://imgflip.com/s/meme/Good-Fellas-Hilarious.jpg
all we have are artist renderings of the earth. dont you think
that's weird. ---
No, we have photos, not just artist renderings.
Re: trump
By: MRO to Philthy74 on Wed Dec 30 2020 01:59:49
he didnt kill thousands or any of that other shit. he was taking
action when people were calling hin a zenophobe.
Of course he didn't 'literally' kill thousands, that would be silly. His actions though, being the man of power that he is, in a global crisis
defiance of the Government Health officials and the WHO. Not the band, that would be silly as well. That's just ONE example, that, unfortunately has not worked out so well for a lot of people and their famillies. That's
not what you stand for. Come on.
Re: trump
By: MRO to Philthy74 on Wed Dec 30 2020 02:00:09
you have no proof the world is round.
Please don't.
Just. Don't.
MRO wrote to Nightfox <=-
all we have are artist renderings of the earth. dont you think
that's weird. ---
No, we have photos, not just artist renderings.
i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an
artist rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go
look at all the renderings through the years.
Of course he didn't 'literally' kill thousands, that would be silly. His actio
though, being the man of power that he is, in a global crisis where people ar
dying everywhere, did. He persueded people in rallies in defiance of the Gover
ent Health officials and the WHO.
Come on.
that's 20/20 hindsight dude.
we could have been better off if we did nothing at all. it seems like this virus keeps bouncing back.
defiance of the Government Health officials and the WHO. Not the band, that would be silly as well. That's just ONE example, that, unfortunately has not worked out so well for a lot of people and their families. That's
the who and the cdc are fucking garbage. the who lies for china as well.
none of these experts know shit. they're all failures. look how long fauci worked on aids. look at what he did with aids. same shit. nothing. back in the day they said he loved to be on tv and that hasnt changed, has it.
oh another denier. sheep.
If he'd been listening to the WHO he would have initially done LESS than he did. They were not on the ball.
Come on.
Joe, is that you? :)
that's 20/20 hindsight dude.
we could have been better off if we did nothing at all. it seems like
this virus keeps bouncing back.
Is this your professional opinion?
the who and the cdc are fucking garbage. the who lies for china as
well.
What exactly makes one "fucking garbage"? Regardless of your opinion, they
oh another denier. sheep.
I know you're just trolling me. There are smart people in these groups.
If he'd been listening to the WHO he would have initially done LESS
than he did. They were not on the ball.
Agreed. But in all fairness, no one saw this coming. All the non believers
none of these experts know shit. they're all failures. look how long fa worked on aids. look at what he did with aids. same shit. nothing. bac in the day they said he loved to be on tv and that hasnt changed, has it.
Are you a Scientist or Doctor?
i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an artist rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go look at all the renderings through the years.
none of these experts know shit. they're all failures. look how long
fauci worked on aids. look at what he did with aids. same shit.
nothing. back in the day they said he loved to be on tv and that
hasnt changed, has it.
Are you a Scientist or Doctor?
Re: Re: trump
By: Philthy74 to MRO on Fri Jan 01 2021 10:02 pm
none of these experts know shit. they're all failures. look how
long fa worked on aids. look at what he did with aids. same shit.
nothing. bac in the day they said he loved to be on tv and that
hasnt changed, has it.
Are you a Scientist or Doctor?
I don't know over there, but the Spaniard scientists/doctors I know are very disappointed by the "expert" advice we are getting from the related Ministries :-)
Re: trump
By: MRO to Nightfox on Thu Dec 31 2020 10:02 pm
i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an artist
rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go look at all
the renderings through the years.
I thought I read once that it's because the Earth isn't round, it's egg-shaped and looks pretty ugly in a picture unless they "pretty it up."
I would assume it wouldn't be too difficult to just turn the Hubble around and take a picture if they really wanted to.
i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an artist >rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go look at all the
renderings through the years.
I would assume it wouldn't be too difficult to just turn the Hubble around and take a picture if they really wanted to.
rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go look at all
the
renderings through the years.
I would assume it wouldn't be too difficult to just turn the Hubble
around and take a picture if they really wanted to.
https://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov
The Earth Polychromatic Imaging camera on DSCOVR takes regular photos of the Earth from orbit, and NASA publishes them there.
The famous "Blue Marble" image was taken by an Astronaut from Apollo 17.
Yeah, it's not like restricting travel early on, trying to avert panic,he didnt kill thousands or any of that other shit. he was taking
action when people were calling hin a zenophobe.
Of course he didn't 'literally' kill thousands, that would be silly. His > actions though, being the man of power that he is, in a global crisis
where people are dying everywhere, did. He persueded people in rallies
in defiance of the Government Health officials and the WHO. Not the band, that would be silly as well. That's just ONE example, that, unfortunately
has not worked out so well for a lot of people and their famillies.
That's not what you stand for. Come on.
i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an
artist rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go
look at all the renderings through the years.
What exactly makes one "fucking garbage"? Regardless of your opinion,
they are the governing bodies that make up the medical experts on this planet. My point, if we get back to the context of my original post,
was that the President should be backing his medical experts, and
urging his citizens to do the same. You are probably alive today
because you got shots when you were young.
https://epic.gsfc.nasa.gov
The Earth Polychromatic Imaging camera on DSCOVR takes regular photos of
the Earth from orbit, and NASA publishes them there.
so you think that looks real, huh?
The famous "Blue Marble" image was taken by an Astronaut from Apollo 17.
what about all the other blue marbles that look fake as fuck too?
Something I am wondering:
If Earth is not round or roundish, why are they trying to hide this fact?
When Democrat leadership was saying, "hey come party." And the icing on
the cake was 6 months of rioting without any real confrontation or containment efforts in major Democrat super-majority strongholds when
"people are dying" of the virus, violating their own lockdown orders.
But heaven forbid people go to church.
Even then, IMHO, the best thing that should have been done would be to
close only major event centers and bars while restrictions placed on
senior care facilities. Trying to lock everything down wasn't ever
going to work, and "slow the spread" was never meant to stop anything
only to not overwelm the hospitals. People are/were always going to die
from this kind of thing.
The global "economic reset" seems to be the real goal in all of the action/reaction at this point. It's done far more harm than good and
there's no possible way to convince the population of the US, or
anywhere else really, to lock down for the better part of another
calendar year.
i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an
artist rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go
look at all the renderings through the years.
There are live 24/7 satellite feeds that are not artist renderings.
i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an
artist rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go
look at all the renderings through the years.
You mean medical experts like those who promoted smoking in the 40s? Or those that pushed a dietary cholesterol and saturated fat narrative in the late 60s that echos today and probably the root cause of an obesity epidemic that covers the globe. Those kinds of medical experts?
Medical experts that have been bought off time and time again to promote a corporate narrative. Experts that as late as early March were still echoing CCP messages about the virus.
what about all the other blue marbles that look fake as fuck too?
Yeah, it's not like you can't lookup the airline flight schedules,
routes and time tables to confirm that routes/shape of the planet or anything... You can't be troubled to google this stuff for yourself.
Now that Trump will soon no longer be President, it is interesting to suddenly see Portland's Democratic mayor talking about "antifa" and "orgainzied criminals."
Now that Trump will soon no longer be President, it is interesting to suddenly see Portland's Democratic mayor talking about "antifa" and "orgainzied criminals."
The election won't be settled until the senate says so. I actually expect some >overhauling on January 6th. There is just not going to be an easy transition >after all the fraud allegations.
Re: Re: trump
By: Tracker1 to MRO on Sun Jan 03 2021 03:24 am
>> i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an
>> artist rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go
>> look at all the renderings through the years.
Tr> There are live 24/7 satellite feeds that are not artist renderings.
i dont give a shit.
>> i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an
>> artist rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go
>> look at all the renderings through the years.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ look at this
why dont we have a REAL photo of the earth? we dont.
Yeah, it's not like you can't lookup the airline flight schedules,
routes and time tables to confirm that routes/shape of the planet or
anything... You can't be troubled to google this stuff for yourself.
no no no no no.
i want a fucking real photo of the fucking planet earth.
we do NOT have it. we have fucking artist renderings. that is what we have. you can look at them all and anybody can see that they are artist/computer renderings.
most of the stuff that comes from nasa are artist renderings.
artist rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go
look at all the renderings through the years.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ look at this
why dont we have a REAL photo of the earth? we dont.
Why don't we have a REAL photo of the edge of the earth? we dont.
On 1/3/2021 9:55 PM, MRO wrote:
Yeah, it's not like you can't lookup the airline flight schedules,
routes and time tables to confirm that routes/shape of the planet or
anything... You can't be troubled to google this stuff for yourself.
no no no no no.
i want a fucking real photo of the fucking planet earth.
no no no no no.
i want a fucking real photo of the edge of the flat earth.
On 1/1/2021 9:02 PM, Philthy74 wrote:
What exactly makes one "fucking garbage"? Regardless of your opinion, they are the governing bodies that make up the medical experts on this planet. My point, if we get back to the context of my original post,
was that the President should be backing his medical experts, and
urging his citizens to do the same. You are probably alive today
because you got shots when you were young.
You mean medical experts like those who promoted smoking in the 40s? Or those that pushed a dietary cholesterol and saturated fat narrative in
the late 60s that echos today and probably the root cause of an obesity epidemic that covers the globe. Those kinds of medical experts?
Medical experts that have been bought off time and time again to promote
a corporate narrative. Experts that as late as early March were still echoing CCP messages about the virus.
--
Michael J. Ryan
tracker1 +o Roughneck BBS
Re: Re: trump
By: Tracker1 to Philthy74 on Sun Jan 03 2021 03:31 am
On 1/1/2021 9:02 PM, Philthy74 wrote:
What exactly makes one "fucking garbage"? Regardless of your opinion, they are the governing bodies that make up the medical experts on this planet. My point, if we get back to the context of my original post, was that the President should be backing his medical experts, and urging his citizens to do the same. You are probably alive today because you got shots when you were young.
You mean medical experts like those who promoted smoking in the 40s? Or those that pushed a dietary cholesterol and saturated fat narrative in the late 60s that echos today and probably the root cause of an obesity epidemic that covers the globe. Those kinds of medical experts?
Medical experts that have been bought off time and time again to promote a corporate narrative. Experts that as late as early March were still echoing CCP messages about the virus.
--
Michael J. Ryan
tracker1 +o Roughneck BBS
Part of the scientific process is being skeptical regarding new ideas
or methods, then challenge them through non-biased control and variable experiments. I get the impression many practicing physicians rely heavily o medical journals, or at least what they choose to publish because they do no have time to perform their own studies. Others prefer not to go against the rain out of fear of being ridiculed by raising questions.
Tracker1 wrote to Philthy74 <=-
Medical experts that have been bought off time and time again to
promote a corporate narrative. Experts that as late as early March
were still echoing CCP messages about the virus.
it just seems strange to me that nasa does these odd things and nobody questions them. they think these artist renderings are fact. people are brainwashed into believing everything nasa says and does. === þ
deepthaw wrote to MRO <=-
it just seems strange to me that nasa does these odd things and nobody questions them. they think these artist renderings are fact. people are brainwashed into believing everything nasa says and does. === =
Which ones are artist renderings?
NASA is very open about labelling when images are artist's
renderings or more commonly, have been manipulated to look more
appealing in visible light. Most of our deep space telescopes
take images in far more than the visible spectrum, and hence
pictures of objects if unprocessed would be pretty dull or
uninformative.
The blue marble photo was taken with a camera, from space and is absolutely not an artist rendering. The extent of manipulation
was cropping and flipping the photo upside down to match what
people would expect otherwise, and the unmodified original is
easy to find.
What is the *real* reason you think there'd be a global
conspiracy to hide the true shape of the Earth, other than
"because they can." It's patently ridiculous, and all it'd take
is one adventrous rebel with their own private jet to stumble
upon the truth.
One of the problems we have today is that too many people defer to "experts" to make decisions for them. Add to that the mystique that the elites like to wrap themselves in. They like to believe that being in expert in <field> automatically makes than an expert in any <other field> and the Leftie media go right along with it.
What is the *real* reason you think there'd be a global conspiracy to hide t true shape of the Earth, other than "because they can." It's patently
I have to believe that "MRO" is just trolling us at this point on this topic. As dumb as he is, I cannot believe it possible that somebody
could be this stupid and continue breathing.
What is the *real* reason you think there'd be a global conspiracy to
hide t true shape of the Earth, other than "because they can." It's
patently
Look up in the sky. The moon is round, the sun is round. It makes no sense to believe the earth is flat.
Look up in the sky. The moon is round, the sun is round. It makes no
sense to believe the earth is flat.
The sun is a disc. the moon is a disc, and therefore the earth is a flat di
The disc sits on the backs of 4 elephants, which are standing on the back o an enormus turtle.
HusTler wrote to All <=-
What is the *real* reason you think there'd be a global conspiracy to hide t true shape of the Earth, other than "because they can." It's patently
Look up in the sky. The moon is round, the sun is round. It
makes no sense to believe the earth is flat.
Please note that I in no way agree with the idiotic belief that the
Earth is flat. It isn't. It's a sphere.
Arelor wrote to Gamgee <=-
Please note that I in no way agree with the idiotic belief that the
Earth is flat. It isn't. It's a sphere.
I myself think it is an egg-oid shaped weird thing that comes
close to being a sphere, if you have imagination enough.
Re: Re: trump
By: HusTler to All on Tue Jan 05 2021 09:38 pm
What is the *real* reason you think there'd be a global conspiracy to
hide t true shape of the Earth, other than "because they can." It's
patently
Look up in the sky. The moon is round, the sun is round. It makes no sense to believe the earth is flat.
The sun is a disc. the moon is a disc, and therefore the earth is a flat disc.
The disc sits on the backs of 4 elephants, which are standing on the back of an enormus turtle.
DaiTengu
Arelor wrote to Gamgee <=-
Please note that I in no way agree with the idiotic belief that the
Earth is flat. It isn't. It's a sphere.
I myself think it is an egg-oid shaped weird thing that comes
close to being a sphere, if you have imagination enough.
Yes, OK it's not a perfect sphere, but for the sake of conversation, especially in the context here (vs flat/disk), it is.
... Forbidden fruit is responsible for many a bad jam.
On 12/31/2020 9:02 PM, MRO wrote:Hey, photography is an artform too.
i have never seen a full picture of the earth that is not an
artist rendering. nasa even admitted this as much. you can go
look at all the renderings through the years.
There are live 24/7 satellite feeds that are not artist renderings.
--
Michael J. Ryan
tracker1 +o Roughneck BBS
---
Synchronet Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com
Which ones are artist renderings?
I have to believe that "MRO" is just trolling us at this point on this topic. As dumb as he is, I cannot believe it possible that somebody
could be this stupid and continue breathing.
deepthaw wrote to Dr. What <=-
I defer to experts because I feel I'm well enough educated to a) understand when their credentials are qualified and b) understand when
a topic is beyond my understanding and that it's best to defer to
experts identified by a.
The problem with lack of critical thinking is partially this battle in education between wanting to (waste time) creating well rounded
citizens, versus it being a vocational thing that just prepares them
for a career without wasting time on "soft skills."
I think the focus on testing is a massive part and despite being a
liberal who supports the department of ed., local schools need more discretion to assess their own performance. We've gone too far towards "teaching the test" because it's all that matters come performance evaluation time.
Nightfox wrote to Gamgee <=-
Which ones are artist renderings?
I have to believe that "MRO" is just trolling us at this point on this topic. As dumb as he is, I cannot believe it possible that somebody
could be this stupid and continue breathing.
MRO keeps occasionally posting stuff like this, and I don't think
I've ever seen anyone convince him of anything. It seems futile
to argue with him about stuff like this.
I have to believe that "MRO" is just trolling us at this point on
this topic. As dumb as he is, I cannot believe it possible that
somebody could be this stupid and continue breathing.
MRO keeps occasionally posting stuff like this, and I don't think I've ever seen anyone convince him of anything. It seems futile to argue with him about stuff like this.
MRO keeps occasionally posting stuff like this, and I don't think I've ever seen anyone convince him of anything. It seems futile to argue with him about stuff like this.
it just seems strange to me that nasa does these odd things and nobody questions them. they think these artist renderings are fact. people are brainwashed into believing everything nasa says and does.
While I agree that NASA are keeping us in the dark about a number of things, I don't think the Earth not being spherical is one of them.
dont you think it's odd that there is no REAL photo of the earth from nasa? the
are all artist renderings.
dont you think it's odd that there is no REAL photo of the earth fromthe
nasa?
are all artist renderings.
To be correct, some are renderings, some are photos that have been "enhanced."
Re: Re: trump
By: MRO to Tracker1 on Tue Jan 05 2021 12:06 am
it just seems strange to me that nasa does these odd things and nobody
questions them. they think these artist renderings are fact. people
are brainwashed into believing everything nasa says and does.
While I agree that NASA are keeping us in the dark about a number of things, I don't think the Earth not being spherical is one of them.
MRO wrote to Andeddu <=-
it just seems strange to me that nasa does these odd things and nobody
questions them. they think these artist renderings are fact. people
are brainwashed into believing everything nasa says and does.
While I agree that NASA are keeping us in the dark about a number of things, I don't think the Earth not being spherical is one of them.
i'm just saying we dont know. and it's very strange that there
are no actual earth photographs of the entire earth.
i'm just saying we dont know. and it's very strange that there are no actual earth photographs of the entire earth.
It has been demonstrated the earth is round thousands of years ago, just need sticks, sun at noon and take measurement from different locations.
I believe that most flatearther don't really believe that the earth is flat. It's just a way to rebel and oppose to what they see at authority and piss people off :-)
i'm just saying why is it that all we have for a total picture of the earth is blue marble that they always Photoshop.
i'm just saying we dont know. and it's very strange that there are no actual ea
th photographs of the entire earth.
If it was flat, wouldn't it be easier to get a picture of the entire Earth?
i'm just saying we dont know. and it's very strange that there are noea
actual
th photographs of the entire earth.
If it was flat, wouldn't it be easier to get a picture of the entire Earth?
If it was flat, wouldn't it be easier to get a picture of the entire
Earth?
That's right :-D
dont you think it's odd that there is no REAL photo of the earth from nasa? they are all artist renderings.
In all honesty, to think that the Earth isn't a fat in the center sphere is akin to thinking centrifical force doesn't move you to the outside at high speeds.
It's odd, but like the other posters have said, the pictures ARE a true and accurate representation of the Earth. They're legit pictures that have
and accurate representation of the Earth. They're legit pictures that have been modified in terms of contrast, brightness, exposure and vibrancy, etc... to make them more amenable to normies. I'd like to see the unedited photographs though.
they have gone out past the earth. they can do one shot of the earth instead of an artist rendering. instead it's always artist renderings with added clouds and the color changed. looks fake as fuck.
everytime nasa does a story it is fake ass picturs.
everytime nasa does a story it is fake ass picturs.
I believe every picture ever released of a planetary body is based on an artist's rendition... the true photograph would be to dark to make
anything out. All the pictures of nebulas and galaxies are fake but that's
neither here nor there, the Earth is still spherical!
Andeddu wrote to MRO <=-
they have gone out past the earth. they can do one shot of the earth instead of an artist rendering. instead it's always artist renderings with added clouds and the color changed. looks fake as fuck.
everytime nasa does a story it is fake ass picturs.
I believe every picture ever released of a planetary body is
based on an artist's rendition... the true photograph would be to
dark to make anything out. All the pictures of nebulas and
galaxies are fake but that's neither here nor there, the Earth is
still spherical!
Andeddu wrote to MRO <=-
@MSGID: <600475D2.4557.dove-debate@amstrad.simulant.uk>
@REPLY: <60034AB6.1164.dove-deb@bbses.info>
Re: Re: trump
By: MRO to Andeddu on Sat
Jan 16 2021 02:21 pm
they have gone out past the earth. they can do one shot of the earth instead of an artist rendering. instead it's always artist renderings with added clouds and the color changed. looks fake as fuck.
everytime nasa does a story it is fake ass picturs.
I believe every picture ever released of a planetary body is based on
an artist's rendition... the true photograph would be to dark to make anything out. All the pictures of nebulas and galaxies are fake but
that's neither here nor there, the Earth is still spherical!
I believe every picture ever released of a planetary body is based on an artist's rendition... the true photograph would be to dark to make anything out.
i'm talking about the earth not having a real photo after all these decades.
You can just increase the exposure time to get a lighter picture. But yes, almost all the pictures you see are enhanced to appeal to the public. Jupiter is made far more colourful than what it really looks like. For accurate ones, look at the ones taken by backyard astronomers.
I'd think they could take a long exposure so there would be enough light in the photo - though with a moving telescope, or a camera on the earth which is moving, there might be issues doing that. But with today's camera technology, I'd imagine they could take the raw data from the camera sensor and increase the exposure level on it to get a brighter photo - though I wonder if even that would be enough.
Nightfox
I'd like to think that with today's camera technology, we could take a sufficiently clean picture of the Earth from the Moon. Software built into the camera could increase the exposure after the shot has been taken anyway, but I don't think that would clear MRO's high bar.
Re: Re: trump
By: MRO to Andeddu on Sun Jan 17 2021 03:48 pm
i'm talking about the earth not having a real photo after all these
decades.
The truth is that there have been very few pictures taken of the Earth in its entirety as most satellites that take pictures do so at low Earth orbit which is too close to capture the entire planet. Modern pictures are composites of snapshots stitched together to appear like a single shot.
MRO was talking about the Earth being flat and citing the unavailability of unedieted pictures as evidence. I don't think he's being serious either way, but the pictures we have available are authentic; they've just been lightly enhanced for public consumpton.
I'd like to think that with today's camera technology, we could take a sufficiently clean picture of the Earth from the Moon. Software built into the camera could increase the exposure after the shot has been taken anyway, but I don't think that would clear MRO's high bar.
And MRO would proably still think it would look fake. Or maybe because the camera adjusted the exposure and/or other settings, it's still an "edited" photo and thus not a real photo of the earth..
Wow, there's two of them that should have stayed in school.
so we never launched anything into space that could look back and take a photo?
and why are these modern composit pictures always edited to add clouds and other dumb shit?
And MRO would proably still think it would look fake. Or maybe because the camera adjusted the exposure and/or other settings, it's still an "edited" photo and thus not a real photo of the earth..
if it's a fake photo i'm going to say it's a fake photo.
i'm not picky but i'm not an idiot. i dont accept bullshit.
High definition cameras on low orbit satellites can capture clouds, you know. If they've added additional clouds and other details it's not something I've ever been made aware of.
Either way, if you're satisfied or not, it doesn't really matter. Those are the pictures we have of the Earth and we have to make do with them.
if it's a fake photo i'm going to say it's a fake photo.
i'm not picky but i'm not an idiot. i dont accept bullshit.
It doesn't matter if they've increased the contrast or enhanced the colours, it's still an accurate representation. If you take a picture of yourself and edit the lighting, you're not going to suddenly see Brad
motherfucker.
I.DO.NOT.WANT.A.FAKE.PHOTO.
i'm not talking about contrast being changed.
faaaaaaaaaake
photoooooooo
all the time.
We've established that there are authentic photographs, one has been around since the late sixties and we've had several more since then. You are talking about the Earth being captured in a single shot... that has
been done. Although 99% of shots that are out there on the internet are heavily edited and enhanced, but you cannot deny that genuine shots do exist; to do so is to exhibit wilful ignorance.
Next up, the Hollow Moon hypothesis...
We've established that there are authentic photographs, one has been around since the late sixties and we've had several more since then. You are talking about the Earth being captured in a single shot... that has been done. Although 99% of shots that are out there on the internet are heavily edited and enhanced, but you cannot deny that genuine shots do exist; to do so is to exhibit wilful ignorance.
I.DO.NOT.WANT.A.FAKE.PHOTO.
i'm not talking about contrast being changed.
faaaaaaaaaake
photoooooooo
all the time.
This guy attemps to explore that topic (and other things as he
digresses with realted things):
https://youtu.be/mxhxL1LzKww
MRO wrote to Andeddu <=-
@MSGID: <6008D967.1219.dove-deb@bbses.info>
@REPLY: <60086735.4613.dove-debate@amstrad.simulant.uk>
Re: Re: trump
By: Andeddu to MRO on Wed Jan 20 2021 05:24 pm
We've established that there are authentic photographs, one has been around since the late sixties and we've had several more since then. You are talking about the Earth being captured in a single shot... that has
no that hasnt been established.
been done. Although 99% of shots that are out there on the internet are heavily edited and enhanced, but you cannot deny that genuine shots do exist; to do so is to exhibit wilful ignorance.
there is no untouched, real photo of the earth that shows it in its entirety. and that is what i keep saying is very strange.
one half. But if you are closer to the Earth, you'll only see a small portion, only to the horizon. Being in "space" only makes the horizon further away than it would be if you were on the ground, or up high in the atmosphere.
You have to go VERY far, in order to see the globe, and humans haven't travelled that far since the moon landings.
Re: Re: trump
so can't one of our probes that we launch out do a look back and send us the photo?
Re: Re: trump
so can't one of our probes that we launch out do a look back and send us the photo?
Next up, the Hollow Moon hypothesis...
Have you ever read H.G. Wells "The First Men in the Moon"?
* SLMR 2.1a * Is it OK to yell "MOVIE" in a crowded Fire Station??
On 2021-01-21 10:31 p.m., MRO wrote:
Re: Re: trump
so can't one of our probes that we launch out do a look back and send
us the photo?
They do, but they are of little scientific interest.
But you would say they are fake anyway :-D
there where a flyby that a remember for a gravity assist that the
Galileo probe did back in 92
https://appel.nasa.gov/2011/05/13/galileos-rocky-road-to-jupiter/
Re: Re: trump
so can't one of our probes that we launch out do a look back and send
us the photo?
Of course not, They do not.
https://youtu.be/rFDjAfwmWKM (The Mercury-bound MESSENGER spacecraft
https://appel.nasa.gov/2011/05/13/galileos-rocky-road-to-jupiter/
that looks enhanced and it's not a full image of the earth.
that looks enhanced and it's not a full image of the earth.
that looks enhanced and it's not a full image of the earth.
If the Earth is round you cannot get the whole thing at once, no matter how far out in space you are.
MRO wrote to Boraxman <=-
@MSGID: <600A472E.1237.dove-deb@bbses.info>
@REPLY: <6009E8B2.19928.dove-deb@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
Re: Re: trump
By: Boraxman to MRO on Thu Jan 21 2021 08:47 pm
one half. But if you are closer to the Earth, you'll only see a small portion, only to the horizon. Being in "space" only makes the horizon further away than it would be if you were on the ground, or up high in the atmosphere.
You have to go VERY far, in order to see the globe, and humans haven't travelled that far since the moon landings.
so can't one of our probes that we launch out do a look back and send
us the photo? ---
Dumas Walker wrote to MRO <=-
@MSGID: <600C39B4.21887.dove-deb@capitolcityonline.net>
@REPLY: <600BA2B3.1249.dove-deb@bbses.info>
that looks enhanced and it's not a full image of the earth.
If the Earth is round you cannot get the whole thing at once, no matter how far out in space you are.
so can't one of our probes that we launch out do a look back and
send us the photo? ---
I suppose they could go to the trouble of orentating the probe mid flight to take a photo, then reorentate it, but why?
What is it you want proven?
Re: Re: trump
By: Boraxman to MRO on Sun Jan 24 2021 12:15 pm
so can't one of our probes that we launch out do a look back and
send us the photo? ---
I suppose they could go to the trouble of orentating the probe mid flig to take a photo, then reorentate it, but why?
What is it you want proven?
i want to know why we do not have a photo of the earth that isnt some artist rendered bullshit.
i want to know why we do not have a photo of the earth that isnt some artist rendered bullshit.
If the Earth is round you cannot get the whole thing at once, no matter how far out in space you are.
Is there argument over whether the Earth is round or not? Is that what this is about?
that looks enhanced and it's not a full image of the earth.
| Sysop: | Gary Ailes |
|---|---|
| Location: | Pittsburgh, PA |
| Users: | 132 |
| Nodes: | 5 (0 / 5) |
| Uptime: | 108:01:20 |
| Calls: | 733 |
| Files: | 2,171 |
| Messages: | 81,479 |
