Is this bad news for my hdd?
https://susepaste.org/90068115
Re: bad news for hdd?
By: Ogg to All on Fri Dec 30 2022 10:43 pm
Is this bad news for my hdd?
https://susepaste.org/90068115
Unless you are doing something really critical with that drive, I would keep running it until you got an actual error :-)
--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
Re: bad news for hdd?
By: Arelor to Ogg on Sat Dec 31 2022 06:51 am
Re: bad news for hdd?
By: Ogg to All on Fri Dec 30 2022 10:43 pm
Is this bad news for my hdd?
https://susepaste.org/90068115
Unless you are doing something really critical with that drive, I would k running it until you got an actual error :-)
--
gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken
well i think current pending sector count means it's becoming unstable.
i have some drives that are comparable to his age and they're doing
quite fine. i have white lable drives which I believe are hitachi. if i hav
his drive is very small and it SHOULD last forever, thought. but that sector ---
þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
I have had larger drives work for about a year with errors like that. It is a definitive sign the drive is having its sunset, but it does necessarily mean it is going to crash tomorrow.
I personally prefer to squeeze some extra time from a drive that is gonna die than switch it earler, probbaly because I have multiple backups and I can deal with a drive crashing :-)
Unless you are doing something really critical with that drive, I would keep running it until you got an actual error :-)
Not sure why the 200 in max and 200 in current are the same.
Coincidence? I never really paid attention to SMART reports
and I didn't have the program that reports that early in my
ownership of the laptop.
Anyway.. this the unstable sectors are the culprits that
contribute to XP failing to do a graceful Shutdown or Restart -
it just stalls.
I personally prefer to squeeze some extra time from a drive that is gonna
die than switch it earler, probbaly because I have multiple backups and I
can deal with a drive crashing :-)
yeah but that is a baby one. and he could get a 4tb pretty cheap now.
why put off to tomorrow what you can do today.
well i think current pending sector count means it's becoming unstable.
his drive is very small and it SHOULD last forever, thought. but that sector warning is no bueno. if i were him i'd get some cheap larger alternative. -+-
MRO wrote to Ogg <=-
Re: bad news for hdd?
By: Ogg to Arelor on Sat Dec 31 2022 10:04 pm
Not sure why the 200 in max and 200 in current are the same.
Coincidence? I never really paid attention to SMART reports
and I didn't have the program that reports that early in my
ownership of the laptop.
Anyway.. this the unstable sectors are the culprits that
contribute to XP failing to do a graceful Shutdown or Restart -
it just stalls.
if this is an older laptop then certainly, replace it with an
SSD. it will be a lot faster.
just be careful. i accidentially damaged a ribon for my touch pad
and i just use a mini mouse for it now. I was being heavy handed
with my laptop because i never use it anyways.
But "Current Pending Sector Count" seems to be critical:
well i think current pending sector count means it's becoming unstable.
I concur. The "200" number looks ominous.
yeah but that is a baby one. and he could get a 4tb pretty cheap now. why put off to tomorrow what you can do today.
I think 4TB would be overkill. Even 2TB would be an extreme in
my case. But a jump from 240GB to 1TB would be quite
sufficient for my T60, and that would cost between $60-$100.
I have contemplated trying a 500GB HDD, but I am enamoured by
the idea of having a much quiter machine (less fan activity,
although the T60 fan is a new replacement and runs quite quiet
already) ..but I also like the idea that an SSD would extend
the already limited batt power which is 3hrs, if I keep the
display brightness way down or turn it off after 3 minutes of
non-use.
drive. Make no mistake: an unrecoverable read error WILL hit some file of yours if you use a drive with pending sectors for any respectable length of time. The real question is how much the files in that drive matter to you. If they matter, switch the drive now. If not, take not much of a hurry.
you could always get a drobo clone like i have, though.
i have 2 of these.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003X26VV4/
a 500mb or 1tb would be fine.
if you go with sata you will see a lot of improvements. less waiting for menus to load and other annoying things with windows.
here's a comparison video someone made for the t60 with ssd
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-uzZXXnuve8
Hello MRO!
you could always get a drobo clone like i have, though.
i have 2 of these.
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003X26VV4/
Does it run quiet? How much total storage have you installed?
Is this bad news for my hdd?
I have been contemplating upgrading to SSD and at least 500GB
to 1TB.
I don't think XP will benefit much from a SSD, XP doesn't really take advantage of the faster drive technology (IMO). I tried puttinig one
into my XP system, but swapped it out for a 7200rpm drive instead.
I don't think XP will benefit much from a SSD, XP doesn't really take
advantage of the faster drive technology (IMO). I tried puttinig one
into my XP system, but swapped it out for a 7200rpm drive instead.
the ssd is just plain faster. there's no TRIM support, so it might slightly impact it.
he could just run win7
I don't think XP will benefit much from a SSD, XP doesn't really take advantage of the faster drive technology (IMO). I tried puttinig one
into my XP system, but swapped it out for a 7200rpm drive instead.
I don't think XP will benefit much from a SSD, XP doesn't really take advantage of the faster drive technology (IMO). I tried puttinig one
into my XP system, but swapped it out for a 7200rpm drive instead.
the ssd is just plain faster. there's no TRIM support, so it might slightly MR>act it.
he could just run win7
I don't think XP will benefit much from a SSD, XP doesn't really take advantage of the faster drive technology (IMO). I tried puttinig one into my XP system, but swapped it out for a 7200rpm drive instead.
I've seen several comparison videos of even older Thinkpads
equipped with SSDs, and the performance/response times are
significantly faster.
he could just run win7
You are correct, it's just that when I tried this with XP I only noted a slightly faster boot time. That was just my experience.
Also about the Windows 7 comment, when I put the same SSD in a Win7
machine, it was 'noticeably' (significantly) faster.
Cougar
You could be correct on that with your hardware. When I tried this it
was on a Dell desktop that had a 7200rpm HDD and I noted a faster boot
up time, but no other significant speed up. This was my experience, and
at the time buying an SSD was pretty pricey. Just seemed like it would
be put to better use on a Windows 7 machine.
Ogg wrote to Cougar428 <=-
I've seen several comparison videos of even older Thinkpads
equipped with SSDs, and the performance/response times are
significantly faster. I was intrigued with T40's being fitted
with SDDs successfully. The T40 is only PATA as well! But
with either the right SATA/PATA adapter or just an SSD model
with PATA, provided a nice upgrade just the same.
Cougar428 wrote to OGG <=-
You could be correct on that with your hardware. When I tried this it
was on a Dell desktop that had a 7200rpm HDD and I noted a faster boot
up time, but no other significant speed up. This was my experience, and
at the time buying an SSD was pretty pricey. Just seemed like it would
be put to better use on a Windows 7 machine.
with SDDs successfully. The T40 is only PATA as well! But
with either the right SATA/PATA adapter or just an SSD model
with PATA, provided a nice upgrade just the same.
There are PATA SSDs available, I had a 128GB PATA SSD in my T42 and used it way beyond its normal useful life. The speed increase made it usable for most everything except full-screen video, which was a little choppy.
Sysop: | Gary Ailes |
---|---|
Location: | Pittsburgh, PA |
Users: | 132 |
Nodes: | 5 (0 / 5) |
Uptime: | 109:13:29 |
Calls: | 733 |
Files: | 2,171 |
Messages: | 81,483 |