• Re: ax.25 kernel stack

    From N1uro@21:1/143 to deon on Sunday, January 02, 2022 10:07:00
    Hello deon;

    deon wrote to N1uro <=-

    By today's standards, isnt most BBS software insecure?

    I may have an old copy of sbbsecho, I don't know. Someone I tried to set up
    to feed was able to turn on echos from other nets which were not allowed in
    my config. This I do not want. It may be sysop error too... just not enough time for me to debug it at the moment.

    ... .. A boiled egg is hard to beat.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    # Origin: Carnage - risen from the dead now on SBBS (432:1/157)
    * Origin: Ham Inter-network Echomail Gateway. (21:1/143.0)
  • From Vk3jed@21:1/109 to N1uro on Monday, January 03, 2022 16:06:00
    On 01-02-22 10:07, N1uro wrote to deon <=-

    Hello deon;

    deon wrote to N1uro <=-

    By today's standards, isnt most BBS software insecure?

    I may have an old copy of sbbsecho, I don't know. Someone I tried to
    set up to feed was able to turn on echos from other nets which were not allowed in my config. This I do not want. It may be sysop error too... just not enough time for me to debug it at the moment.

    Definitely a sysop error. You need to make use of echolist and the echolist keys feature of Synchronet to limit echomail access to specific FTNs. I haven't gone down this road, I use Mystic for my FTN hub, which automatically limits echo access to nodes from the same networks by default.


    ... "Mount your horses, men!!" "We're not that lonely, sir!!"
    === MultiMail/Win v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Linux
    * Origin: Freeway BBS Bendigo,Australia freeway.apana.org.au (21:1/109)